Amy's Choice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be596/be596b2a6a9c7c6fe06b67036143abf5b9ccb31c" alt=""
I adore Amy's Choice. I'm confident that posterity will judge it a classic. The story finds the Doctor, Amy, and Rory flicking back and forth between two scenarios, one of which is a dream they are sharing, the other reality. They are told, by a mysterious figure called the Dream Lord, that to die in the dream will cause them to wake up in reality for good. To die in the real scenario will cause them to, well, really die. One takes place inside the TARDIS which has gone dark and freezing as it hurtles towards a cold sun. The other takes place five years later in the village of Ledworth, with Rory and Amy happily married and pregnant; the Doctor is visiting them, and they are confronted by a group of zombie-like elderly people who can barely walk but are hell-bent on murder. Our three heroes must agree which scenario is the dream, and allow themselves to be killed in it, in order to escape the Dream Lord's puzzle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50037/50037c04b534eec12638d74e6f03905683a26247" alt=""
Nor do I understand the complaints about the psychic pollen, described by the Doctor as "a mind parasite which feeds on everything dark inside you, gives it a voice, and turns it against you". (I love his flip answer to Amy, who demands to know why the pollen didn't also feed on her and Rory. "Oh, the darkness inside you pair, it would have starved to death in an instant; I choose my friends with great care.") Though of course, one follows the other: if one objects to the Boethian nature of the Dream Lord, the pollen must be condemned as well. But again, the fact that the true villain of the story is the Doctor's shadow-self is what makes the story work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19dff/19dffb15ae67ea5580dff5c209d471e6229c14ed" alt=""
The visuals are superb and work dynamically in contrast, as we shuffle back and forth between an idyllic countryside and a darkened TARDIS. The former exudes a wrong tone from the start, precisely because everything seems "too right", and the latter becomes increasingly horrifying as our three heroes become covered in frost and barely able to speak or move -- and is there even such thing as a "cold star"? Both scenarios are disturbing and off-kilter, and it's hard to decide which could be real.
Amy's choice is, of course, ultimately a choice between two men: the fantasy hero from her childhood, and her less than impressive fiancee, who turns out to be the more impressive one after all. She sees the truth of this only when Rory is killed (in the Ledworth scenario), and, lashing out at the Doctor who is unable to save him, decides to kill herself in turn irrespective of whether or not she is dreaming. That the TARDIS scenario turns out to be a dream too is a nice twist that I didn't see coming, and makes sense given that a Dream Lord wouldn't logically have power over any reality. But it also suggests there was a never a "right" choice Amy had to make. Her preference for Rory is based entirely on how she feels in a certain moment. She confronts her devotion to two very different men in a particular now just as the Doctor must face his own demons. The story is ingeniously introspective, a welcome rarity in Doctor Who, and in my opinion a work of art.
Rating: 5 stars out of 5.
5 Comments:
This is very worrying, but I largely agree with you. The bit I don't agree with is the comparison to the Doctor-lite stories.
I can't see the point in equating different with lite. Remember Midnight.
Midnight actually is a lite story -- though it's companion-lite, rather than Doctor-lite. The reason I'm making the parallel between "different" and "lite" is simply because that's what the pattern in the new series has been up until now.
But yes, it is disconcerting that we're largely in agreement. A sign of the apocalypse?
Hmm … you see, I would have said that "Girl in the Fireplace" and "Human Nature/Family of Blood" were also significantly different episodes (as well as among the best).
It may be that anything that disrupts the normal dynamic of Doctor, helper, opponent will strengthen an episode, or it may be the writer has such a strong idea that s/he pushes the normal script envelope. I'm inclined to think the latter.
"Love and Monsters" very nearly worked, but I think it was a mistake to try to play it for humour. It could have been far more dark and sinister.
"Love and Monsters" very nearly worked, but I think it was a mistake to try to play it for humour. It could have been far more dark and sinister.
Although I usually lean in this direction (much prefer the dark and tragic to the comedic), unfortunately I think Davies was boxed into a corner with this story. Forced to write an episode revolving around a green fat man in a thong, he did just about the only sensible thing he could, and played it for laughs.
I love the idea behind Love and Monsters -- the Doctor as a mythical figure leaving chaos in his wake, and the playful swipe at nerdy Doctor Who fans like ourselves. But the slapstick humor gets too heavy, as you note; and yet I honestly don't see how else the story could have come close to working given the premise.
I really loved Amy's Choice and suspect it will become known as a real classic.
Actually, I loved Love and Monsters. Kind of stupid, but great fun, and a nice idea to develop the material already hinted at in one of the best scenes from Rose ("Dad, it's one of your nutters!").
Post a Comment
<< Home